UPAYA TUNTUTAN HAK YANG DAPAT DILAKUKAN OLEH PIHAK YANG BERKEPENTINGAN TERHADAP AKTA NOTARIS YANG CACAT YURIDIS

Ghansham Anand, Agus Yudha Hernoko

Abstract


The deed made by notary has the strength of perfect evidence, both in formal and material aspects. Therefore, a notary must be accountable for the accuracy of the deed formally and materially. If the deed is not made as determined by regulations, it will impact on juridical defect of the deed and on authenticity loss of it or on cancellation of it. If the comer faces a notary to formulate and write his/her action or actions into the authentic deed in accordance with the authority of the notary, and then the notary makes the deed in accordance with the comer request or desire, in this case it provide the basis that it has occurred an engagement between the comer and the notary. Therefore, in addition to the main task that the notary pours the desire or the will of the parties who require his/her services into authentic deeds, the notary also has the obligation to ensure the validity of the authenticity. Act No. 2 of 2014 and the provisions of Article 84 and 85 of Act No. 30 of 2004 on Notary governing provisions of witnesses, do not regulate the procedure of imposing sanctions on the notary, as cost replacement, compensation and interest. Similarly, the procedure of verification to cancel the notary deed or to state that the deed only has the strength of evidence as the deed under the hand.

Keywords


Notary, Authentic Deed, Legal Remedy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Burgerlijk Wetboek, Staatsblad Tahun 1847 Nomor 23.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 117, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 4432).

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, yang diundangkan tanggal 15 Januari Tahun 2014, (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 3, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 5491).

Wet op het Notarisambt 1999 Staatsblad Tahun 1999 Nomor 190.

Nieuw Nederlands Burgerlijk Wetboek.

Anand, Ghansham, 2014, Karakteristik Jabatan Notaris di Indonesia, Sidoarjo: Zifatama Publisher.

Chazawi, Adami, 2003, Hukum Pidana Materiil dan Formil Korupsi di Indonesia, Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Harahap, M. Yahya, 1982, Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian, Bandung: Alumni.

Hernoko, Agus Yudha, 2011, Hukum Perjanjian, Asas Proporsional dalam Kontrak Komersial, Cetakan kedua, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Lotulung, Paulus Effendi, 1993, Bebe-rapa Sistem Tentang Kontrol Segi Hukum Terhadap Pemerintah – Seri Ke-1: Perbandingan Hukum Administrasi dan Sistem Peradilan Administrasi (Edisi II dengan Revisi), Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, 2010, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya.

Munsyi, Alif Danya, 1985, Bahasa Menunjukan Bangsa, Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.

Nico, 2003, Tanggungjawab Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum, Yogya-karta: Center for Documentation and Studies of Business Law.

Pohan, Marthalena, 1985, Tanggung-gugat Advocaat Dokter, dan Notaris, Surabaya: Bina llmu.

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono, 1982, Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia, Bandung: Sumur.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


The Journal is published by The Faculty of Law - Hang Tuah University

©All right reserved 2016. Perspektif Hukum, ISSN: 1411-9536, e-ISSN: 2460-3406

 

View My Visitor Stats